Sad that even during audit proceedings they keep veils in place.
You know I'm stumped..they know we know they cheated. Justice will be done yet their lies just keep compounding.. I guess they figure they can only burn once ...but do they realize they won't escape ?
Your Govenor solution was good.. never realized that as an option. Will send that question to him. Thank you.
Legal citizens and elected or appointed gov't officials that just shrug their shoulders, feel, and state that "it is what it is" and take no action, are also guilty of violating their oaths, so, they can also be charged - at least as accomplices!
Our GOP secretary say in in Cherry county, going to have to ask about the phone, but know she had to set in a corner on a chair and couldn't move. I will have to inquire more of her about that.
Listening to Billy Cunningham on KFAB (1110 AM) after 9:00 PM tonight. He covered what is currently happening with Biden to Harris ...or some other crisis to cover up what is being changed or orchestrated re: the next election (Voter ID scams, same day registration, ballot drop boxes, ...!) It's not just Nebraska ,.Folks's ! Show up, stand up, speak up! Before they do it! Before State and Local Gov't and Election Officials again steal the procedures for registration , selection of "electors", voting, processing, counting, certifying (of legal, valid, voter rolls and electors) HAND COUNTED ballots.
Demand - no machines, no same day registration, no mail in ballots,....., - of your legislature , SofS, AG, County Attorney, Election Commissioner, and staff, volunteers . But also all instructions, processing, counting, audits, etc - to be Overseen by County Sheriff and Deputies, staff - not "Party' affiliated , "useful idiots"!
Get it? We do not trust our Gov't! Maybe it is no longer ours? Too late already?
I have delivered this notice to at least 4 counties' election commissioners so far. Please learn/ask me about implied-in-fact contracts if you need to, but deliver a copy of this notice to your own county election commissioner:
Dear election officials,
Per state supreme court rulings, etc., an enforceable "implied-in-fact contract" arises between parties who signify agreement through an action – as in a voter surrendering a completed ballot according to instructions of election officials. Implied warranties and implied duties always accompany implied-in-fact contracts. This notice to you, by me the undersigned voter, reminds you of said contract and the accompanying implied warranties and duties that are binding by law upon you. By no means is this notice intended to educate you about centuries’-strong precedent, so if said subject is unfamiliar to you, you seriously need to consult your legal counsel lest you risk being derelict in your due diligence. This notice reminds you that, among a number of other responsibilities said contract binds you to, you are legally bound to implied warranty and implied duty.
Merely one of many aspects of the warranty is that you most accurately and honestly count and report all legitimate ballot selections while preventing dilutions by counting illegitimate votes. Vote totals in MANY recent elections have been in excess of the expected numbers of votes allowed, and I will no longer tolerate such breach of implied contract if it continues. Along with this is the implied duty to consider the most verifiable cast ballot by me to be the one and only authoritative ballot cast by me. I will not tolerate that my in-person ballot surrendered to you when I've presented irrefutable proof of my identity is destined for the category of "provisional" because an unknown person previously submitted a ballot in my name. This implied duty demands that you consider ballots surrendered to you in my name but without ID to be more provisional than my just-in-time ballots when I show valid ID.
Another of many implied duties incumbent upon you is that you reveal relevant information to me, including the fact, if true, that my ballot selections are converted into unsuperviseable electronic signals prior to them being counted, and that those unsuperviseable electronic signals are the most authoritative basis by which race results get reported. If any relevant facts are not acceptable to me, then I will be entering said contract under duress. As you can manifestly understand, the unsuperviseable possession of my ballot selections in a format mutable prior to counting or exploitable, by an entity whom I've not vetted for their character, motives, objectivity, etc., would certainly be unacceptable to me.
If any attorney challenges there being such contract arising with election officials simply for lack of consideration (payment), this angle should hold up in courts: state laws and constitutions place the burden of payment upon the government because they've decreed that elections must be free. The SPIRIT of those laws and constitutions are to allow MORE people, those who would not be able otherwise to afford it, to enter into the implied-in-fact contract rather than to obviate it completely. Also "A contract without consideration is enforceable if the nonperformance of the promisor will cause injustice" (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/consideration)
Bob, God has called you, gifted you, and gives you grace for His work that you're doing. Thank you for being faithful through that "Lone-Ranger-and-Tonto's-gone" feeling where you're at.
Smartmatic election software has just been indicted for bribery. From tomorrow on I will try to substitute the word "software" for "machine" as the exact product that I am against processing my ballot selections.
Our GOP secretary sat in on our election, here's her experience:
The counting takes place in the commissioner's meeting room, approximately a 15 + 25 foot room. Window on the north wall, door entering clerks office in East corner, West side has a door going to courthouse hall, south wall is solid. Machine and machine feeders were at the south wall. There were 4 feeders, 1 Democrat, 1 Republican, 1 Libertarian, 1 Independent. The election commissioner observed the process from the side of the machine.
The lady who was We The People's observer arrived, she was presented with an agreement, she was required to sign, she had to sit in a chair on the north wall by the windows, that were covered in cardboard, the front of the chair where her feet were was an imaginary line she wasn't allowed to cross, approximately 15 feet away from the machines, she wasn't allowed to have her phone in the room, but the clerk and all four machines feeders had their phones in their purses on the table that they were able to, and did frequently access during the day. She was not allowed to speak a word to any of the 5, not even at lunch time.
Her report that went to Mr. Evnen stated, "from what I was able to observe, there was nil to no fraud before the ballots were fed into the machine, after that nobody knows."
Sad that even during audit proceedings they keep veils in place.
You know I'm stumped..they know we know they cheated. Justice will be done yet their lies just keep compounding.. I guess they figure they can only burn once ...but do they realize they won't escape ?
Your Govenor solution was good.. never realized that as an option. Will send that question to him. Thank you.
Legal citizens and elected or appointed gov't officials that just shrug their shoulders, feel, and state that "it is what it is" and take no action, are also guilty of violating their oaths, so, they can also be charged - at least as accomplices!
How do you plead? Evidence to the contrary?
Wouldn't you love to be in the courtroom while they try to explain their ignorance of the laws they broke.
Ignorance of the Law is not a defense? Like - "I didn't know it was illegal for illegals to kill anyone in America!" ????
YES
That ole song? "I didn't know the gun was loaded!" (Judy Canova as Calmity Jane?)
Lol yep
Upsetting truly wonder if and whom won any of the offices is legit
Totally
Pretty sure bet if they appoint positions that promote the leftist ideaology you may have slected not elected appointees.
Our GOP secretary say in in Cherry county, going to have to ask about the phone, but know she had to set in a corner on a chair and couldn't move. I will have to inquire more of her about that.
Please do and let us know! Thank you!
Will do we have a zoom Friday night if I don't talk to her before that.
Listening to Billy Cunningham on KFAB (1110 AM) after 9:00 PM tonight. He covered what is currently happening with Biden to Harris ...or some other crisis to cover up what is being changed or orchestrated re: the next election (Voter ID scams, same day registration, ballot drop boxes, ...!) It's not just Nebraska ,.Folks's ! Show up, stand up, speak up! Before they do it! Before State and Local Gov't and Election Officials again steal the procedures for registration , selection of "electors", voting, processing, counting, certifying (of legal, valid, voter rolls and electors) HAND COUNTED ballots.
Demand - no machines, no same day registration, no mail in ballots,....., - of your legislature , SofS, AG, County Attorney, Election Commissioner, and staff, volunteers . But also all instructions, processing, counting, audits, etc - to be Overseen by County Sheriff and Deputies, staff - not "Party' affiliated , "useful idiots"!
Get it? We do not trust our Gov't! Maybe it is no longer ours? Too late already?
I have delivered this notice to at least 4 counties' election commissioners so far. Please learn/ask me about implied-in-fact contracts if you need to, but deliver a copy of this notice to your own county election commissioner:
Dear election officials,
Per state supreme court rulings, etc., an enforceable "implied-in-fact contract" arises between parties who signify agreement through an action – as in a voter surrendering a completed ballot according to instructions of election officials. Implied warranties and implied duties always accompany implied-in-fact contracts. This notice to you, by me the undersigned voter, reminds you of said contract and the accompanying implied warranties and duties that are binding by law upon you. By no means is this notice intended to educate you about centuries’-strong precedent, so if said subject is unfamiliar to you, you seriously need to consult your legal counsel lest you risk being derelict in your due diligence. This notice reminds you that, among a number of other responsibilities said contract binds you to, you are legally bound to implied warranty and implied duty.
Merely one of many aspects of the warranty is that you most accurately and honestly count and report all legitimate ballot selections while preventing dilutions by counting illegitimate votes. Vote totals in MANY recent elections have been in excess of the expected numbers of votes allowed, and I will no longer tolerate such breach of implied contract if it continues. Along with this is the implied duty to consider the most verifiable cast ballot by me to be the one and only authoritative ballot cast by me. I will not tolerate that my in-person ballot surrendered to you when I've presented irrefutable proof of my identity is destined for the category of "provisional" because an unknown person previously submitted a ballot in my name. This implied duty demands that you consider ballots surrendered to you in my name but without ID to be more provisional than my just-in-time ballots when I show valid ID.
Another of many implied duties incumbent upon you is that you reveal relevant information to me, including the fact, if true, that my ballot selections are converted into unsuperviseable electronic signals prior to them being counted, and that those unsuperviseable electronic signals are the most authoritative basis by which race results get reported. If any relevant facts are not acceptable to me, then I will be entering said contract under duress. As you can manifestly understand, the unsuperviseable possession of my ballot selections in a format mutable prior to counting or exploitable, by an entity whom I've not vetted for their character, motives, objectivity, etc., would certainly be unacceptable to me.
Signed____________________________________________
Do you have any SCOTUS references on implied-in-fact contacts?
OK, I googled "implied contract" "supreme court" and get hits like these:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/implied_contract
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiutc3y1MSBAxXZmYkEHbYuAqoQFnoECBsQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.supremecourt.gov%2FDocketPDF%2F22%2F22-722%2F253462%2F20230130134021838_Calapristi%2520Main%2520E%2520FILE%2520Jan%252030%252023.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1sDWNMF7ENjjM4S8EJf9aA&opi=89978449
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied-in-fact_contract
If any attorney challenges there being such contract arising with election officials simply for lack of consideration (payment), this angle should hold up in courts: state laws and constitutions place the burden of payment upon the government because they've decreed that elections must be free. The SPIRIT of those laws and constitutions are to allow MORE people, those who would not be able otherwise to afford it, to enter into the implied-in-fact contract rather than to obviate it completely. Also "A contract without consideration is enforceable if the nonperformance of the promisor will cause injustice" (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/consideration)
Thx!
Bob, God has called you, gifted you, and gives you grace for His work that you're doing. Thank you for being faithful through that "Lone-Ranger-and-Tonto's-gone" feeling where you're at.
Whenever someone says "where's the evidence for election fraud", this is the best answer I know of for those who might not think they possess court-admissible quality evidence: the scientific polls fail - https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/pollster-rasmussen-says-election-fraud-renders-scientific-election/
Thank you, Brother!
Excellent catch!
Amen!!
Smartmatic election software has just been indicted for bribery. From tomorrow on I will try to substitute the word "software" for "machine" as the exact product that I am against processing my ballot selections.
I've been following!
Our GOP secretary sat in on our election, here's her experience:
The counting takes place in the commissioner's meeting room, approximately a 15 + 25 foot room. Window on the north wall, door entering clerks office in East corner, West side has a door going to courthouse hall, south wall is solid. Machine and machine feeders were at the south wall. There were 4 feeders, 1 Democrat, 1 Republican, 1 Libertarian, 1 Independent. The election commissioner observed the process from the side of the machine.
The lady who was We The People's observer arrived, she was presented with an agreement, she was required to sign, she had to sit in a chair on the north wall by the windows, that were covered in cardboard, the front of the chair where her feet were was an imaginary line she wasn't allowed to cross, approximately 15 feet away from the machines, she wasn't allowed to have her phone in the room, but the clerk and all four machines feeders had their phones in their purses on the table that they were able to, and did frequently access during the day. She was not allowed to speak a word to any of the 5, not even at lunch time.
Her report that went to Mr. Evnen stated, "from what I was able to observe, there was nil to no fraud before the ballots were fed into the machine, after that nobody knows."
How ridiculous. What are they hiding??
I love the report she gave!!
Thanks for sharing!
What county is this again?
Cherry.