third grade addition

Dear Friends,

Let me catch you up on my battles with our so-called public servants.

Two things. Starting with my county board meeting again yesterday morning. (They finally posted the video a few minutes ago.) Watch by clicking here or on the image below. Transcript is below, in case I didn’t articulate something clearly. (4 min video)

Transcript
I sent the following to our Secretary of State's office yesterday:

I started with the following quote from a particular researcher:

~". . . there are two electronic folders inside our secret vote-tabulating software that electronic ballot images can be placed into. Votes are counted from those digital images, not the paper ballots. Once converted to digital 1's and 0's, it is easy to change votes . . . and hence, the results of an election. end quote

I went on to state the following simple facts:

Vote-counting is a third grade process of addition. 

Software that is written to read ballot timing marks . . . and voter selection marks . . . and perform simple addition on those voter selection marks . . . is not sophisticated software. 

Anyone who calls it "proprietary" is a snake oil salesman.

In other words, someone who is engaging in deceptive marketing, or psychological manipulation or gaslighting.

There is only one reason to shroud tabulator software and hardware in secrecy—and that is to rig elections.

There is only one reason for preventing voters from accessing all ballots so they can verify the results of their election—and that is to protect a rigged election.

Every computerized tabulator has a backdoor.

Rigging elections is treason.

The odds are very high that we will see a nationwide, irrefutable exposé on the secret, fraudulent process that you all call "elections" before this year is up.

The misinformation/disinformation/malinformation campaign of our SoS office will not survive it. End of my letter

Our second president, John Adams said, "There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty." 

It's very similar to the maxim engraved over the main entrance of our State Capitol,  The Salvation of the State is Watchfulness in the Citizen.  Watchfulness, not trust.

As you all well know, vote tabulation has been taken away from the People and placed in the hands of a private and very secretive corporation.

The members of this Lancaster county board say absolutely nothing whatsoever about that secrecy or the complete deprivation of the right of citizens to exercise watchfulness in our vote counts.

Do any of you have any idea what you're protecting, by protecting secret so-called elections?

I'm sure you do, but for the benefit of everyone else, let me answer the rhetorical question.  

You're protecting all manner of evil, vile activity, not the least of which is child sex trafficking, which includes massive money laundering.

The last thing I'll say today is this.

The reason I don't come in here and say the pledge of allegiance with all of you is because I don't believe you mean it when you say "liberty and justice for all."

Good day. [end]

---

The other thing is that when I got home from the county board meeting yesterday, I found the short letter below in my inbox. It was passed on from a friend in another county who received it from his clerk. (All the clerk did was pass on what our deputy SoS wrote.)

Being tired of our deputy secretary’s constant lying, I decided to sit down and respond. Keep in mind that while it is addressed to “Friends,” (many of whom were blind-copied), my target was Bena, who was also blind-copied. I’m sure by now I’m living rent-free in his mind fulltime. I love it. Enjoy.

Subject: Bena lies

Friends,

Someone sent me a typical Bena (deputy sos) response. See the attachment [image above^].

In that response, Bena claims it is against Nebraska law to hand count votes unless the machines aren't working. That is laughable and absurd. Bena is selling legal fiction. He's engaging in lawfare. His answer depends on his audience, and who he thinks he can intimidate. I was there a mere two years ago in a private meeting when he told a handful of senators that we did not have to use the machines.

That's the short answer to Bena's response.

The longer and more rigorous answer is below.

1) Unless someone is part of a scheme to commit election fraud, no state or County election officials can know for a fact when the computerized tabulators are working properly and when they aren't. Not without a full manual audit. Herein is the problem with computers. They can easily be programmed to work honestly in one precinct and/or race, and dishonestly in another precinct and/or race. And given that no one is allowed access to the secret tabulator software except the private vendor, no one in Nebraska state or County government can say with any authority when they are being used honestly and when they aren't. (And even if they could, things could change in a heartbeat with a hidden connectivity device or a thumb drive with hidden malware.)

2) L&A testing proves nothing. As I said above, software can easily be written to commit fraud after the L&A testing. Software can easily be written to compartmentalize fraud by precinct or race. Again, the only way to know if a computerized tabulator has worked properly is to count all the votes by hand, and compare the hand count results with the computer count results.

3) The tabulators have internal audit features that show the tabulator's work, but Bena refuses to allow Voters access to it. This is prima facie evidence that the machines are being abused to manipulate election results. There's no other reason for the secrecy. Vote-counting is a simple third grade process of addition. Software that is written to read ballot timing marks and voter selection marks, and perform simple addition on those voter selection marks, is not sophisticated software. Anyone who calls it "proprietary" is a snake oil salesman, engaging in deceptive marketing.

So again, we have no way of knowing if the tabulator has worked properly or not, because the NIST-prescribed audit data that is meant for public consumption is not allowed to be reviewed by the owners of Nebraska's elections, i.e., Nebraska Voter-Taxpayers!! (Thanks, Bena. You should quit before you bury yourself any deeper.)

Note: Bena whines that election integrity advocates (which should be all of us, as who can say they don't want verifiably accurate election results?) won't show him proof of fraud, but then he refuses to show us proof of accurate results. Bena is a one-man, sleight-of-hand clown show. He shrouds everything in secrecy. Again, there's only one reason for that secrecy—to hide fraud.

4) County election officials (commissioners and clerks alike) were elected (presumably) by the People of the County to administer "fair and open elections free from outside influence," on behalf of the People of the County, who pay their wages and benefits. They work for the People of the County. They took an oath to the People of the County when they took an oath to our Constitution. They don't work for Bena.

County election officials have no way of knowing if a private vendor with secret software and hardware is influencing/manipulating election results or not, unless they conduct a full manual audit.

County election officials would be wise to exercise due diligence. Allowing election results to be rigged is a very serious crime. The only solution is to make certain that they are NOT rigged. There's only one way to do that. Hand count.

Secret software from a private corporation must be considered outside influence.

5) Nebraska law states that the Election Act "shall be liberally construed so that the will of the registered Voters is not defeated by . . . the conducting of any election or the certifying of the results of the election."

The will of all honest Voters is verifiably accurate results. Elections don't belong to the SoS office. They belong to the People.

6) Our Nebraska State Constitution, the Supreme law of Nebraska, states that ". . . there shall be no hindrance or impediment to the RIGHT of a qualified voter to exercise the elective franchise."

That RIGHT to exercise the elective franchise includes the RIGHT to cast votes AND the RIGHT to ensure that those votes are counted accurately.

7) Bena tries, after every election, to gaslight (i.e., deceive) Voters with his fake precinct audits, which he calls "Mandatory Manual Audits." During these precinct "audits," a few races are selected to be counted manually. (If it's legal for Bena and County election officials to count votes manually, it's legal for We the People to do so as well. Bena and County election officials sit BELOW the People, in the Constitutional hierarchy.)

But again, counting three races in one or two precincts means nothing, as it is very easy to write software to compartmentalize election cheating.

Conclusion
Bena can't be trusted. The machines can't be trusted. Elections belong to our Counties.

The People demand a return to transparent and verifiable (hand-counted and video-recorded) constitutional elections before the general election.

The will of the People and our Constitution transcend the will of our rogue SoS office and Legislature.

"We, the people, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom," are standing up and taking back the right (and rights) that usurpers have hijacked (while we were busy working and paying their bills), namely the right to self-government (through verifiable elections).

To our Counties
Get ready. Hand counting is easy. It only takes third grade math. We have plenty of time. And we'll be happy to help.

Don't worry about the SoS office. Their job was never to micromanage, but simply to ensure that our county elections were honest and verifiably accurate, which they have failed miserably to do. We'll be glad to show them how it's done and to show all our work.

In the Cause of Liberty and Justice for ALL,

Yours Truly

---

That’s it.

God bless,

Robert J. Borer