Dear Friends,
This will be short.
First of all, our small Coalition of American First candidates was provided with a serious briefing on the status of our southern border yesterday by Jaeson Jones. You can find out about Jaeson here. You can also find videos here. I wish we could have recorded the conversation, so I could have shared it with you. It was very sober and interactive.
Jaeson complained that no one at the head of any level of government, or at the head of any law enforcement agency, is telling the American people the truth about what’s going on down there.
He said the mantra of these highly sophisticated and deadly cartels is “Take it back,” referring to the border states of TX, NM, AZ and CA. He said they are dead serious about that objective. They have a very sophisticated intelligence network, and they know how to work the system and stay just under the radar.
As Jaeson was complaining about the unwillingness of the federal government to really do anything, I spoke up and said I thought we relied too much on the federal government and wanted to know what Abbott was doing about shutting down the border. He responded with “Nothing.” He said Abbott doesn’t believe he has the power to shut down the border. He and I both expressed disagreement with such a stupid belief.
Abbott is just another RINO who is afraid to take risks and unwilling to protect the people of his state from very dangerous intruders as his oath requires him to do.
Unbelievable.
Pillen’s recent contribution of a few state troopers to the border situation did nothing to really help the situation. …and I can assure you, Pillen isn’t doing anything to try to persuade Abbott to shut down that border. Pillen personally benefits from an open border.
This country belongs to our States. There is no federal government without our States. No governor wants to understand the power and rights of our States. That’s because they are all bought. And they are all bought, because we don’t have real elections by which we can elect strong public servants.
Moving on.
One of our senators couldn’t resist responding to my recent letter. You can read what I sent here. I’ll be sharing his letter and my response at some point in the next few of days. “Sparks will fly.”
Also at some point in the next few days, I’ll be putting the spotlight on the Burwell public indoctrination (aka school) system. They are feeding our kids garbage. (What’s new?) Stand by. Sparks will fly there as well.
Meanwhile, there’s a great 13 minute video segment from Bannon on this page. I highly encourage watching.
If you wish to stay up on things, it doesn’t get any better that Bannon’s Warroom. Listen live, or after the fact. He’s on for two hours every day except Sunday:
https://gettr.com/user/warroom
Last but not least, if you have the stomach for some foul language, this “blog” by Celia Farber, who suffered much trying to expose the fraud of HIV starting back in the 80s and every since, has some interesting content from Twitter:
That’s it.
God bless.
Stayed prayed up.
Robert J. Borer
RINOS - worthless!! NEVER NEVER give up your guns! The scum coming across the border is everywhere!! Keep fighting PATRIOTS!! 🇺🇸❤️🤍💙 - fight like you have never fought before!!! Can’t wait for next writing - when sparks fly!!!
(ATB) Not cartels. Cartels, as defined by the Law of War Manual - “in the context of the Law of War, a cartel is typically a formal agreement between two belligerent parties for the exchange, treatment, or release of prisoners. Cartels might set terms for the repatriation of wounded prisoners, the conditions of captivity, or other matters relevant to the treatment and handling of detainees.”
It is worth noting that the term “cartel” has other connotations outside the law of war context, especially in the realms of economics and crime (e.g., drug cartels).
However, the concept of “unlawful combatants,” which may encompass individuals who are members of certain terrorist organizations. Unlawful combatants are individuals who directly participate in hostilities without being authorized by international law to do so and, therefore, do not receive the same protections as lawful combatants under the law of war.
It’s important to note that “terrorist” and “unlawful combatant” are not synonymous. While some terrorists might be classified as unlawful combatants when they engage in hostilities, not all unlawful combatants are terrorist, and not all acts of terrorism are acts of war.