public confidence in our elections not a priority of our SoS office

Dear Friends,

I’d first like to share a comment by Peg Fong to yesterday’s letter:

In a candid first meeting with the SOS, he asked me to pray for him. I have prayed for him every time the Lord puts him on my heart.

I believe that I can fervently pray daily from dawn to dusk for him to repent and come clean, but if he isn't willing to do the right thing, the guilt remains on him.

It's very sad when people exchange integrity over fame and fortune.

Hearts like his, like many entrenched politicians', I fear, are stone hard. Both sides of the party line have sold out the People for wicked motives. I don't trust any of them. This is why Trump came to "Drain the Swamp",

Thank you for doing a great job exposing what once was hidden. Nebraskans know what's going on. We won't put up with them any longer.

---

Now then, I tweaked a letter I previously wrote and sent it to state and local officials yesterday afternoon. Some of you were blind-copied. The Subject line read” “public confidence in our elections is not a priority of our SoS office, here’s why”.

Here’s the letter:

Dear Friends and Public Servants,

Public confidence in our elections is not a priority of our SoS office. If it were, he/they would be doing things differently.

As it is, the Secretary refuses to provide us with our voting machine cast vote records. The big question is, Why?  

He certainly could provide them if he wanted to. The "law" (in this case better known as lawfare) is no excuse. He could easily have the law changed, if he wanted it changed. Legislators would listen. The People would support it. 

I'm betting the only reason the law currently reads the way it does is because of lobbying efforts by special interests. Committee members rely heavily on testimony from Evnen and other election officials (often the "big three") who've been lobbied by a private company promising to make their jobs easier (if not their lives richer).

I have news for the Secretary. Nebraskans are not about "easy." We work hard for our money, and we expect him to as well. 

We're about transparency and integrity—independently verifiable integrity, like banks do. 

The Court of Public Opinion demands it. The Court of Public Opinion demands real, unbroken-chain-of-custody evidence (of fair, honest elections). 

"Court" and "evidence" and "chain-of-custody" are all terms Evnen should be well acquainted with as a lawyer. 

We don't have to take his naked assertions as truth. Elections are too important. More important than our money. Too much depends on them. They are not something to mess with. Computers are too easy to hack, especially when no one gets to watch or see the software, or the constant updates to that software. (There is nothing proprietary about addition. They are hiding something.) 

Our votes should not be counted behind closed doors by a private company. The salvation of the state is watchfulness...watchfulness in the citizen, not trust in the citizen, and certainly not a grant of exclusive watchfulness to some private company with conflicting interests and no accountability to the People.

Frankly, we have no reason to believe the Secretary when he says has no cast vote records. 

The Certification document for the machines provided to me by the Secretary's office clearly states (on page 3) that the machines do in fact create cast vote records (CVRs). The machine "simultaneously scans the front and back of a paper ballot ... in any of four orientations for conversion of voter selection marks to electronic CVRs." After scanning the ballots, the machine totals up the individual candidate tallies (aka CVRs) it obtained from each ballot. 

The CVR is a built-in machine self-audit feature required by the federal government. If all the machine is doing is adding one more vote to a running total each time it scans a ballot, and all we can know is the final total, no one can know if the count was honest or not. No one can know if the vote count was organic or not.

If Evnen actually has the CVR feature turned off, he is grossly incompetent at best, or a bad actor at worst. It's no stretch. Being nice at times is no proof he's not a bad actor. Think your worst sex offender, serial killer or pedophile. They lure the naive, gullible and unsuspecting with niceness. 

And who leaves a six figure job, or better, for a five figure one? Maybe a true servant would, but that hardly describes Evnen.

Back to CVRs. CVRs are a valuable tool for determining the presence of vote-count manipulation. They are a check and balance within the system. The only reason to turn them off (if such is actually an option) is to hide fraud. 

Test decks and partial self-audits are no proof of election integrity whatsoever. Bad actors can easily make provisions in the software for a few honest test batch and precinct counts within what is otherwise an overall artificial, manipulated and fraudulent count.

If Evnen was a good actor and a true public servant, he would WANT to have those cast vote records so he could verify that the totals are what they should be, and that no one has messed with the machines. He could also put people's minds at ease by sharing the data. 

But he obviously doesn't want to do any of that. What more needs to be said??

What is going to happen when the three second statement by Evnen in this video is proven wrong? Who's going to jail? Everyone who's been warned that they are trampling on the God-given and Constitution rights of the People and refused to listen, I'd suspect.

Hit replay a couple times on that video. Let it register what is going on. Evnen is making a truth claim about something that he has no personal knowledge of. In other words, he’s waging psychological warfare against/upon the citizens of Nebraska.

If Robert Evnen wanted to engender confidence in Nebraska elections, he would do things differently. That fact that he isn't doing things differently, after so much public outcry, goes a long way toward demonstrating that he has loyalties other than to his oath and to the People of Nebraska.

Some say Robert Evnen is Nebraska Public Enemy Number One. Not a good position to be in, obviously, even if it were just perception. He's probably betting the truth won't come out. He should do some self-reflection and make changes while there's still time. There's no magic wall around NE that has prevented the fraud from taking place here that has taken place everywhere else. If he has placed his bet on Albert Sensors, he has made a really bad bet. (I think he knows better. The Albert Sensor story is just another weapon he can use to con the public.)

Many are praying for him. But like one person recently said, "I can fervently pray daily from dawn to dusk for him to repent and come clean, but if he isn't willing to do the right thing, the guilt remains on him."

Robert J. Borer
Bcc: too numerous to list

---

I just sent my County Commissioner another letter.

God bless,

Robert J. Borer