Hpoe is not enough! Fair is not enough! And I don't think they got the message yesterday at the hearings on three election bills. I'll hold my comments on them other than to say that all three need to be re-written for "Common Sense" to prevail. That won't happen with the power embedded to the current (imposter) Secretary of State, and one HORSE Legislature!
I had fun writing it and trolling Republicans at the same time. It went to every member of the Legislature plus the governor, the ag, and several in Evnen's office.
Plz advise me, those of you who were at yesterday's committee mtg (BTW, I could not stay long enough to hear several good testifiers)
:
"Subject: Your question to Connie Reinke was really answered, please allow me
Senator Lowe,
Your question to Connie Reinke as she was testifying before the committee yesterday deserves a little more clarifying answer. I'm hesitant to claim to speak for Connie, but please let me offer this to you while copying her on it.
The tests and results that you read of in your question to Connie were of a type of test that would look for a systemic flaw resulting from incompetent ES&S design. Those tests could not uncover competent fraud based on candidate (or issue) ideologies of specific races of concern - of serious enough concern to ES&S or to the much larger election theft apparatus that includes Edison Research.
Testing random races is straw man testing, a shameful waste, as far as we are concerned. Yet the machines should indeed pass those kinds of tests, so we support laws to those ends, but reluctantly with rolling eyes. A different way to select races to test could be convincing to those of us suspicious of fraud: to expose fraud, a perfect storm that flushes a fraud suspect into the light can be arranged using Ian Swanson's 2016 legislative race as an example. ES&S underestimated hard-campaigning over-achiever Ian's eventual win margin and had to stop machine counting after the polling places closed so they could modify their algorithm for the last number of votes counted. That the legislative race at that time had no polling done beforehand for the margin to be known explained why ES&S (Edison Research actually maintains the pre-election day polling data) underestimated how much non-machine fraud they needed to do ahead of time. So they had to quick in the dark of night apply more machine fraud than they were expecting they'd have to.
Selecting which races to investigate for fraud should not be random but races characterized by an ideological chasm existing between candidates and one candidate is outspoken, not just claiming to be "conservative", but naming the issues and positions on them that Leftists can't tolerate. Tests should target the races that smell of corruption for their ideological stakes, slim margin of victory by the more left-leaning candidate, when there's an overnight lead flip of a race where no polling data could give ES&S forewarning that the more conservative candidate was a first-time hard-campaigning candidate so ES&S was caught off guard.
Still, it must be taken into account that the fraudsters at higher levels than ES&S have shown themselves smart enough to distribute the fraudulent gains over as many techniques (accounting for any specific state's laws) as they can so that the discovery of merely one fraud technique does not result in enough votes switched to arouse enough suspicion that the outcome of the race was flipped.
BTW, I have an ES&S insider advising me writing this, so it is NOT entirely guesswork. "
WEll now - "There ya go again!" A Collage degre and/ or law degree may nowdays be a detriment to the "Common Sense" of the citizens smelling a RAT('s)! read those three bills a few times. Diagram and compare word's and sentences - the smell is coming from their not really fixing anything but the increase of the power theyn have taken from "We the People"!
As in the Declaration of Independence (it should also apply to State and Local Gov't bodies) "... it is your right, your duty, to ...." So when will WE start our Ne Convention of non-elected, non faction, Citizens to r"...reinstitute that Gov't ....! to alter the Ne Constitution and form a Bi (two horse) cameral that nwe can lead to water and direct/order them how to drink!
Hope they listen. Somebody has to want fair elections.
Hpoe is not enough! Fair is not enough! And I don't think they got the message yesterday at the hearings on three election bills. I'll hold my comments on them other than to say that all three need to be re-written for "Common Sense" to prevail. That won't happen with the power embedded to the current (imposter) Secretary of State, and one HORSE Legislature!
Great letter, great idea!!!
I had fun writing it and trolling Republicans at the same time. It went to every member of the Legislature plus the governor, the ag, and several in Evnen's office.
Boy am I glad that they now have more people than me to dislike! Shades of the Colonists!
**mic drop** YOU are the Master!!!
Plz advise me, those of you who were at yesterday's committee mtg (BTW, I could not stay long enough to hear several good testifiers)
:
"Subject: Your question to Connie Reinke was really answered, please allow me
Senator Lowe,
Your question to Connie Reinke as she was testifying before the committee yesterday deserves a little more clarifying answer. I'm hesitant to claim to speak for Connie, but please let me offer this to you while copying her on it.
The tests and results that you read of in your question to Connie were of a type of test that would look for a systemic flaw resulting from incompetent ES&S design. Those tests could not uncover competent fraud based on candidate (or issue) ideologies of specific races of concern - of serious enough concern to ES&S or to the much larger election theft apparatus that includes Edison Research.
Testing random races is straw man testing, a shameful waste, as far as we are concerned. Yet the machines should indeed pass those kinds of tests, so we support laws to those ends, but reluctantly with rolling eyes. A different way to select races to test could be convincing to those of us suspicious of fraud: to expose fraud, a perfect storm that flushes a fraud suspect into the light can be arranged using Ian Swanson's 2016 legislative race as an example. ES&S underestimated hard-campaigning over-achiever Ian's eventual win margin and had to stop machine counting after the polling places closed so they could modify their algorithm for the last number of votes counted. That the legislative race at that time had no polling done beforehand for the margin to be known explained why ES&S (Edison Research actually maintains the pre-election day polling data) underestimated how much non-machine fraud they needed to do ahead of time. So they had to quick in the dark of night apply more machine fraud than they were expecting they'd have to.
Selecting which races to investigate for fraud should not be random but races characterized by an ideological chasm existing between candidates and one candidate is outspoken, not just claiming to be "conservative", but naming the issues and positions on them that Leftists can't tolerate. Tests should target the races that smell of corruption for their ideological stakes, slim margin of victory by the more left-leaning candidate, when there's an overnight lead flip of a race where no polling data could give ES&S forewarning that the more conservative candidate was a first-time hard-campaigning candidate so ES&S was caught off guard.
Still, it must be taken into account that the fraudsters at higher levels than ES&S have shown themselves smart enough to distribute the fraudulent gains over as many techniques (accounting for any specific state's laws) as they can so that the discovery of merely one fraud technique does not result in enough votes switched to arouse enough suspicion that the outcome of the race was flipped.
BTW, I have an ES&S insider advising me writing this, so it is NOT entirely guesswork. "
WEll now - "There ya go again!" A Collage degre and/ or law degree may nowdays be a detriment to the "Common Sense" of the citizens smelling a RAT('s)! read those three bills a few times. Diagram and compare word's and sentences - the smell is coming from their not really fixing anything but the increase of the power theyn have taken from "We the People"!
As in the Declaration of Independence (it should also apply to State and Local Gov't bodies) "... it is your right, your duty, to ...." So when will WE start our Ne Convention of non-elected, non faction, Citizens to r"...reinstitute that Gov't ....! to alter the Ne Constitution and form a Bi (two horse) cameral that nwe can lead to water and direct/order them how to drink!
Thank you!
Either way, we can't trust them and shouldn't trust them.