wiltgen fails first test

Dear Friends,

I just sent a letter out to a wide audience. First check out this short video:
https://rumble.com/v2mifwk-sd-canvassing-epic-event-may-13th-sioux-falls-sd.html

…and this announcement:
https://www.sdcanvassing.com/event-details/greater-magistrates-tour-professor-david-clements-with-guest-robert-borer

Professor Clements will also be in NE next week:

Okay. Here’s the letter, sent to our executive and legislative branches and county election officials:

To: ne.elections.are.a.charade@pillen.evnen.gov
Bcc: (all of the above mentioned)
Subject: Pillen fails to secure our rights with lame appointment

Dear Friends and Members of State and Local Government,

Governor Pillen failed to secure the God-given right of Lancaster County residents to self-government as required by his oath by appointing yet another "election commissioner" who either doesn't understand his duty (to administer "fair and open elections free from outside influence") or simply refuses to do his duty for some nefarious reason.

Lancaster County Election Commissioner Todd Wiltgen, recently appointed by Pillen (because statute wrongly dictates that such an important position be filled by appointment rather than election), refused our request for a simple copy of the tabulator audit logs from the recent City of Lincoln election (his first election since being appointed). These logs can provide valuable insight into how our votes are being "counted" behind the closed doors of the tabulator, i.e., whether honestly/organically, or dishonestly by malware.

Todd Wiltgen effectively said, "You're not getting any transparency and accountability from me. Keep moving, you peons. Forget about "fair and open elections free from outside influence." Forget out decentralization of power. Forget about county sovereignty. Forget about saving this city and/or this state through Watchfulness. I'm not having it. None of it."

We the People have a wake-up call for Wiltgen. His job description is to serve the People of Lincoln and Lancaster County by administering "fair and open elections free from outside influence." 

This spirit of election law is captured in Nebraska Revised Statute 32-207:

Election commissioner
In order to further the purpose of ​FAIR AND OPEN ELECTIONS FREE FROM OUTSIDE INFLUENCE, the election commissioner shall have the duty of operational and administrative oversight over the business of the office, subject to review by the Secretary of State. 
https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=32-207 

The spirit is also captured in Nebraska Revised Statute 32-102:

Act; applicability; how construed.
The Election Act shall apply to all elections held in the state unless otherwise specifically provided. The act shall be liberally construed SO THAT THE WILL OF THE REGISTERED VOTERS IS NOT DEFEATED by an informality or a failure to comply with the act with respect to the giving of any notice or the conducting of any election or the certifying of the results of the election.
https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=32-102

Todd Wiltgen is off to a bad start. He handed our votes over to a private company (outside influence) to be counted in complete and utter secrecy. This is maladministration and it is unconscionable. It is absurd on its face.

The common sense will of registered/qualified voters in Nebraska is transparency and verifiability in the conducting of our vote counts. Elections belong to us...to We the People. They are the means by which we give (and/or withhold) our all-important Consent. Nevermind the fact that We the People pay for these elections, and everything that goes with them.

It would appear Wiltgen is committed to the NE swamp, which would be why Pillen chose him. If true, this is very short-sighted on Wiltgen's part.

Wiltgen might say he's only following orders, but he's not obligated to follow dictatorial and subversive orders. He's obligated to keep his oath to our Constitution and to protect the rights of the People of his county. The Secretary of State has no dictatorial power over him, no matter how much either one of them may think he does.

There's only one reason for Evnen to be so secretive about our vote counts, and that is fraud. He is protecting fraud. There's no other reason. Choosing to hand-count a few precincts is no proof that fraud isn't occurring. Software can very easily be written to provide for a few exclusions to the fraud. (Evnen has no idea what the software consists of.)

Given the utter secrecy by which Evnen and his "voting machine" company are conducting our votes counts, and the widespread proof of malware in the machines, Nebraskans are demanding a return to the gold-standard for counting votes—hand counts, at the precinct level. Totally decentralized, minimizing fraud. 

Nothing in statute requires machine counts, and even if there were such a requirement, it would be trumped by our Constitution, which says:

Nebraska State Constitution Article III-18
Local or special laws prohibited.
The Legislature shall not pass local or special laws in any of the following cases, that is to say:
Providing for the election of Officers in Townships, incorporated Towns or Cities.
The opening and conducting of any election, or designating the place of voting.
https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/articles.php?article=III-18  

Nothing in Nebraska law prohibits hand counts or requires their approval. Hand counts are nothing new. There are provisions in the Election Law to resort to hand counts (see below)—and if hand counts are good enough for auditing machine counts, they're good enough to serve as the only count (and the simple addition of a video camera would make them auditable by anyone and everyone):

32-901.
Ballots; voting procedure.
(1) To vote for a candidate or on a ballot question using a paper ballot that is to be manually counted....
https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=32-901

32-1012.
Centralized location; partial returns; when; designation of location; counting procedure.
(1) ... If for any reason it becomes impracticable to count all or a part of the ballots with optical scanners, the election commissioner or county clerk may direct that the ballots be counted manually following as closely as possible the provisions governing the manual counting of ballots.
https://nebraskalegislature.gov/laws/statutes.php?statute=32-1012

closing
Evnen is a frontman for ES&S and his McCarthy friends who own it. His air-gap defense of the machines is total propaganda. As is the alleged security provided by his trojan horse Albert Sensors. It'll all come out in the near future. NASS (National Association of Secretaries of State) promotes censorship and propaganda. CIR (Center for Internet Security) is a private left-wing NGO. 

Evnen's name will be mud before this is over (to say the least). As will Pillen's.

The Hand Count Road Show is on the move, with cyber security expert Mark Cook (who proved how easy it is for voting machine companies to flip votes with their cheating software) leading the way. Check it out.

https://handcountroadshow.org/

WV SoS Mac Warner recently became the first SoS to say that 2020 was stolen: https://headlineusa.com/sos-says-2020-election-was-stolen-after-reviewing-evidence/

I'll leave you with quotes from ES&S docs regarding audit logs in the postscript.

Robert J. Borer

P.S. Quoting ES&S:

AUDIT LOGS
• Electionware saves a record of all user actions with usernames to the system audit log. Electionware maintains an audit log that shows all system processes. This audit log can be filtered by date and type of event.
• The log can be printed, or saved in a variety of file formats, including .pdf, .rtf, .html, .xls, and .csv. The log operates during all processes, including results processing. Optionally, log events can be viewed in real-time in the output window, which displays errors in red text, warnings in blue text, and normal events in black text.
• Audit records created during the election definition and ballot preparation include records for all steps in the finalization of the ballot layout. These records are date/time stamped, include a description of the action and the module in which the action occurred. Audit reports can be filtered by date, event type, and sorted by ascending or descending timestamps.
• Audit logs on the EMS server either in Electionware or the database cannot be modified.

https://www.essvote.com/storage/2020/12/Electionware-Security-Bulletin.pdf

In the ES&S Certification document, it is stated in no uncertain terms on pg 3 that their tabulators scan each ballot for conversion of voter selection marks to electronic cast vote records, which can then be tallied. These cast vote records enable auditing of the vote count, but Evnen won't let us have them, even though we paid for them.
https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/voting_system/files/EVS6100Cert_Scope_%2528FINAL%2529.pdf

In another ES&S document (provided by the SoS in response to a Public Records Request), the machines generate "detailed audit and event logs." Again, these digital records are public records, paid for by the People. There is no legitimate reason why they can't be made available to the Public. The only reason for keeping them hidden is vote-count manipulation. Redaction of passwords is very easy. There's nothing to hide if they aren't cheating.