what is our secretary's office addicted to?
Dear Friends,
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that the people who have assumed tyrannical control of Nebraska’s elections, namely our fragile and insecure Secretary of State Bob Evnen and his Barney Fife sidekick Wayne Bena, are addicted to something.
The question is, what?? Vendor kickbacks?? Unlimited terms in their positions?? What??
In a legislative hearing, Bob Evnen once accused poor single mothers of being too easily bribable, and therefore not morally qualified to help conduct what we all want, which is simple transparent and verifiable counts of all legitimate votes. (That was his justification for using the machines, which, as we all know, can easily and ironically be used to cheat, on a statewide scale—he thinks we’re all too stupid to figure that out.)
Was he projecting? What makes him or Bena any less bribable? What other reason is there for them to force secretly constructed and easy hackable tabulators on us besides being bribed??
Surely, as a lawyer, he’s not so stupid that he can’t construct a manual process that is transparent, verifiable and not susceptible to fraud?? Checks and balances in such a process are very easy to come up with.
We have this big, ridiculous fight going on over how to conduct elections. The options are simple. Count all real votes in secret, or count them in the open.
The latter is very easy to do. But Evnen and Bena refuse. Why? WHY??? What are they hiding?? What are they protecting?? Who are they protecting??
They certainly aren’t serving the will of the People, as required by the Election Act:
”The Election Act . . . shall be liberally construed so that the will of the registered voters is not defeated by . . . the conducting of any election or the certifying of the results of the election.” NRS 32-102
Who among us can say we don’t want honest elections?? Who among us can say that elections don’t belong to the People?? Who among us can say that government isn’t supposed to be by Consent of the People?? Who among us can say that falsified Consent is real Consent?? Who among us can say that there aren’t People who want to cheat in our elections?? Who among us can say that Consent shouldn’t be verifiable?? I know who: TRAITORS.
This entire “situation” could quickly and easily be defused with a return to simple gold standard manual counts of all real votes.
There’s a reason Evnen and Bena are doing everything in their power to prevent that, and it can’t be a good one. To all honest people, it makes no sense whatsoever.
I’ll be sending all of the above across the state later today. I’ll give our so-called public servants time to wash the sleep from their eyes first.
Here’s a five minute video for you. I’ll be sending it across the state later today as well.
God bless. Stand up and speak up.
Robert J. Borer
P.S. Here’s me sitting on the floor in the dark in my basement in front of my stove with my laptop writing this. :-)
P.P.S. Vote John Walz. He asked me to write him a letter yesterday to send to all county clerks and sheriffs in the 3rd District. Maybe I’ll share in the next few days, assuming I get his permission. It was all about election integrity.
Another good analysis Robert, of the election situation in Nebraska and all over the US. Why use private voting machines that are hackable, costly and have election results that aren't auditable or verifiable. The only reason someone would want voting machines used in elections is because they're getting kickbacks, bribes, blackmailed, coerced or threatened in some way. Using expensive voting machines that are easily hacked isn't good for "We the People"
Guess the easy, obvious solution of vote counting in the open is too difficult for the “genius” minds to comprehend. And don’t even complicate it further, heaven forbid, by turning the lights on!