"trusted sources"
plus "the big question" and a short assignment
Dear Friends,
From the Central City Republican Nonpariel (CCRN):
"The Secretary of State's office is also cautioning voters about the potential rise in election-related misinformation and stresses the importance of relying on trusted sources."
Our Secretary’s office is not a “trusted source” (nor is the CCRN). Our Secretary’s office is an extension of the DC swamp, and they are only echoing the narrative talking points of the election fraud cabal component of that swamp: “Trust us, and only us. We’re the experts.”
How often have we heard liars say “Trust me”??
The Salvation of the State is WATCHFULNESS in the Citizen, NOT TRUST. (click link)
The more the Secretary tells Nebraskans we should trust him, the more Nebraskans are asking, "Wait . . . what?? Why does he want us to trust him? Why can't he just exercise and practice transparency?? What is he hiding??" (I'll tell you what he's hiding. Something very nefarious. Rigged elections.)
The fact the Secretary is asking for trust when he should be providing us with transparency and verifiability says it all. It shouts prima facie evidence of fraud from the highest mountain tops.
Here’s a nugget from John Adams about placing trust in government:
“There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.”
“trust no man living with power”
But our Founders did put a lot of trust in the citizenry, to choose their own representatives, ASSUMING the citizenry would be protective and jealous of their constitutions (state and federal) and hold their representatives accountable to it. (That’s why all elected public servants take an oath, so we can hold them accountable for treason.)
Our constitutions are the highest law in the land and provide checks/restraints against tyranny, by government and citizens alike.
Sects of citizens can be tyrants just like members of government can. They can be enticed to vote benefits for themselves at the expense of their neighbors. It’s commonly called theft, and politicians engage in it all the time (these days), in order to get votes.
This is why our Founders gave us a constitutional republic instead of a democracy. A democracy is the rule of mob sentiment, which any silver tongue can work up. There are no checks and balances in a democracy except the end of a gun. Democracies only work when the People are highly virtuous.
One more time. Politicians routinely buy votes by promising benefits to one group or special interest at the expense of another. This is an unconstitutional abuse of our system.
Right now, our entire “government” is unconstitutional. There’s no evidence any of them were actually elected.
Here's “the big question” for today.
Why is the Secretary's office engaged in hustling everyone to vote?? Why are they pushing everyone to vote? Why are they spending so much effort and public money on getting everyone to vote?
I'm 65. It never used to be this way. It’s not the Secretary’s job to get everyone to vote. His job is to announce an election and then conduct it fairly and honestly, for whoever is concerned enough to show up.
I'll tell you why our Secretary’s office is hustling people. Because they are engaging in a form of electioneering (at public expense, in more ways than one). They are diluting the vote of concerned, moral, educated citizens so it doesn't look so crazy when they rig an election to install bad actors (that our Secretary’s office has been bribed or blackmailed into installing).
This is why we can't have transparency and verifiability in our elections. The con would be over.
But why is the con so prevalent? Why is there not one honest top election official in the entire nation?? How is this widespread con so “well” maintained??? I strongly encourage you to read this latest write-up about Nebraska’s Franklin Scandal and find out.
Moving on.
Here’s the email I sent to our SoS office yesterday, as well as to election offices and legislative offices across the state.
Dear Friends,
Everyone in our SoS office knows they are perpetrating and perpetuating a scam of the worst kind on Nebraska voters.
With regard to our "elections," there is:
-No accountability.
-No transparency.
-No verifiability.
-No balancing of election records.
-Voter roll changes that aren't transparent.
-No comprehensive ballot chain-of-custody.
-No ballot security — ballots can easily be counterfeited.
-Secret software.
-Secret hardware.
-Secret vote-counts.
-Psychological manipulation with MDM (misinformation, disinformation, malinformation)
-Psychological manipulation using an expectation of trust.
-Hackable voter rolls and tabulators (they can't prove otherwise).
It all adds up to one gigantic scam, i.e., one gargantuan system of fraud (that facilitates all other manner of evil by those "in power" illegitimately).
And everyone with half a brain knows it.
Why are we participating in a lie?
Would we participate in any other transaction in the public square if we knew the scales were rigged??
Our votes are clearly not being weighed honestly or equally. Transparency and verifiability wouldn't be an issue if they were.
God calls what our SoS office is doing an abomination.
—Divers weights, and divers measures, both of them are alike abomination to the LORD. -Pro 20:10
—Divers weights are an abomination unto the LORD; and a false balance is not good. -Pro 20:23
—A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight. -Pro 11:1
—A just weight and balance are the LORD'S: all the weights of the bag are his work. -Pro 16:11
Christ said, "Blessed are the peacemakers." Not the liars and con artists.
Evnen could fix all of this so easily. The fact he refuses to do so verifies all of the above.
And the fact no one else in government is calling him out for it exhibits an across-the-board betrayal of the oath of office.
Yours Truly.
That’s it.
Oh wait. There’s this. Take a look.
And this. Please accept a very small assignment. I need back-up.
Send a simple email to the following addresses (copy and paste):
sos.elect@nebraska.gov, wayne.bena@nebraska.gov, waynebena@yahoo.com, robert.evnen@nebraska.gov, revnen@compuserve.com
In the Subject line, just type: We don’t trust you. That’s it. You don’t need to type anything in the body. This way, they get the message without opening the email. We can make a strong impression if we get a lot of people to do this simple task.
God bless,
Robert J. Borer
I just sent the following short email across the state to the usual corrupt government suspects, particularly member of the SoS office
Subject: is our SoS office a trusted source??
Dear Friends,
From the Central City Republican Nonpariel (CCRN):
"The Secretary of State's office is also cautioning voters about the potential rise in election-related misinformation and stresses the importance of relying on trusted sources."
Our Secretary’s office is not a “trusted source” (nor is the CCRN). Our Secretary’s office is an extension of the DC swamp, and they are only echoing the election narrative talking points of that swamp.
How often have we heard liars say “Trust me”??
The Salvation of the State is WATCHFULNESS in the Citizen, NOT TRUST.
The more the Secretary tells Nebraskans we should trust him, the more Nebraskans are asking, "Wait . . . what?? Why does he want us to trust him? Why can't he just exercise and practice transparency?? What is he hiding??"
Here’s a nugget from John Adams about placing trust in government:
“There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.”
“trust no man living with power”
We have demanded transparency, Watchfulness and verifiability in the administration of Our elections, in accordance with our Constitution. Our Secretary works for us. He has not delivered, in violation of His oath.
FYI.
Yours Truly
Is ‘electionteerig’ the same as ‘racketeering’. 🤔 the similarities are amazingly noticeable. They can promise ANYTHING, but given past history and accomplishments, I think their record loudly states they have no intention of doing anything they say. They see what SHOULD be done, what the people want and need, but then walk away without doing it. They obviously think we’re either stupid or blind! Guess what. The sleeping giant is now awake …. and ticked.