the game plan: hold corrupt public servants accountable

Dear Friends,

I sent the following to our SoS office this morning. I blind copied all members of our “Legislature,” all Nebraska county “election” offices, and a handful of friends.

To: sos.elect@nebraska.gov, wayne.bena@nebraska.gov, robert.evnen@nebraska.gov, colleen.byelick@nebraska.gov, waynebena@yahoo.com, revnen@compuserve.com

Subject: a story about the election fraud cabal/kleptocracy

[No salutation, I just started with the following:]

A certain county commissioner told a certain concerned citizen to forward any evidence of election fraud to the SoS office.

I laughed, and then shared with this concerned citizen how I would respond to this obtuse commissioner: 

Commissioner,

And what if the Secretary's office is helping to facilitate the fraud? 

They are already forcing these expensive computerized, secret vote-count tabulators on counties that can't afford them, in violation of the law. 

Elections are a county matter. The cost of elections, by law, is supposed to be a county expense.

You took an oath to our Constitution. That Constitution says, up front, in Article I-1, that the role of government is to secure the God-given, inherent and inalienable rights of the people. The first and foremost right of the people is to institute a government of public servants of their choosing, through their consent.

Are you telling me your oath means nothing to you? And that you intend to defend the Secretary's office over and against our Constitution and the right of the people of this county to exercise our elective franchise in a way that ensures honest and verifiable results??

It is not incumbent upon us to provide evidence or proof of fraud. It is incumbent upon you to ensure the integrity of our elections, and to provide proof of the same. Nothing less. 

It is our right to demand transparency.

If overthrowing a legitimate government is treason, then overthrowing (subverting the integrity of) the consent by which that government is supposed to be instituted, whether intentionally or by a lack of due diligence, is also treason.

The Secretary's office refuses to give us access to the computerized tabulator software or the tabulator cast vote record self-audit data.

The refusal to be transparent is prima facie evidence they are hiding something. That something must be assumed to be fraud.

You are our line of defense against state level corruption. There is nothing illegal about conducting manual, transparent, verifiable tallies of all legitimate votes.

Please confirm your intent. Is it to keep your oath, or betray it?

Respectfully, 

Robert J. Borer

P.S. The election fraud cabal that our SoS office is a member of, and that has conned our legislature and county election offices into supporting, is going to suffer a deadly blow (in terms of law and public sentiment) in the coming weeks, beginning at the U.S. Supreme Court later this week.

---

holding corrupt/illegitimate government accountable
In our particular form of government, all political power, including the power to hold present government accountable, ultimately resides in and with the People, under God.

It was We the People, under God, after all, who instituted government in the first place.
Quoting: “We, the people, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, do ordain and establish the following declaration of rights and frame of government…”
–NE Const. Preamble

Most states have something similar. For example, here’s Illinois’ Preamble:
”We, the People of the State of Illinois - grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political and religious liberty which He has permitted us to enjoy and seeking His blessing upon our endeavors . . .”

If not, the idea is clearly expressed in our common Declaration.

how do we exercise this power?
We exercise it by expressing conviction, i.e., strong sentiment, the kind of sentiment contained in anti-slavery rhetoric.

It doesn’t require an irate vocal majority to change things. Not even close. But it does require a sizable crowd to show up and cheer on/support those who are vocal.

If a person is a liar or a traitor, we should call them such. They won’t like it, but that’s the whole point. To make them uncomfortable. Truth is a sword. It pierces the soul.

Jesus didn’t pull any punches. He called a spade a spade. The religious rulers he dealt with didn’t like it. In fact, they had Him killed over it.

Which reminds me, all government is religious and moral in nature. Think about that.

some historical verification
Abraham Lincoln (NE’s Capital namesake) affirmed, in so many words, that political power resides in the sentiment of the people (i.e., the way the people think, feel, speak and show up).

Quoting:
“[P]ublic sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it, nothing can succeed. Consequently, he who molds public sentiment, goes deeper than he who enacts statutes or pronounces decisions. He makes statutes and decisions possible or impossible to be executed."

Lincoln again:
"…in a popular government statutes and decisions are rendered possible or impossible of execution by public sentiment. It is in reference to such sentiment that legislatures and courts determine what they may and may not attempt." 

…and again:
"In a government like ours, public sentiment is everything and he who can change public sentiment could change the government, practically speaking."

Thomas Jefferson said as much:
"...authority rests on the harmonizing sentiments of the day.”

Who holds the power? We the People do, under God. Everything starts with a strong conviction of this fact.

“The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.” (Pro 28:1)

Don’t be afraid to speak the truth. Who knows. It might just become contagious.

God bless,

Robert J. Borer