Dear Friends,
I just sent the following across the state:
Members of the Elite "elected" Class—
Nine days after the November 3rd, 2020 "election," while election officials were still "reviewing and double checking the entire election process prior to finalizing the result," the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued the following statement:
"The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history."
You can find the statement here:
Christopher Krebs was the Director of CISA at the time. You can listen to Mr. Krebs tout the mantra here (in 5 sec). It was obvious propaganda.
He was fired just a few days later.
An official DHS email dated November 18th of 2020 from Nathaniel Madden (nathaniel.madden@hq.dhs) to Emerald Robinson explains why.
Quoting from that letter:
Subject: Krebs termination
"Long story short. Krebs stepped out of his lane when he made a broad statement about the election as a whole and not just the cyber and infrastructural security of the thing. That's why he got fired. Questions of domestic fraud aren't in CISA's jurisdiction.
Following [sic] you can quote as a DHS official:
CISA was successful in preventing election interference via a cyberattack on election infrastructure during the President election. [this remains to be proven]
Election fraud is different than election interference and is beyond the scope of CISA authorities.
CISA does not have firsthand information on allegations of voting fraud or investigate such claims, responsibility for which lies with State and local authorities and the Department of Justice.
Each state is responsible for the execution of its own elections. Not CISA and not the federal government.
Allegations of voter fraud are being adjudicated through the court system where they belong.
Nate Madden
Director of Strategic Outreach and Engagement.
DHS/OPA
Homeland Security
Robinson goes on to explain that Krebs was "not a cybersecurity expert at all — and that his hiring was mostly due to being a close personal friend to DHS head honcho Chad Wolf..."
You can find the DHS letter and Robinson's commentary here:
Qualified voters have a right to "cast secure, reliable ballots that [are] accurately counted," and knowingly so.
Secret software vote counts unconstitutionally jeopardize that right, if not completely deny it.
What is the definition of a traitor? Is it someone who took an oath and then allowed our all-important votes to be counted in secret?
A day of reckoning is still ahead for those who have been administering fraudulent/secret elections.
Robert J. Borer
P.S. You can click the hyperlinked text above. ^ This election case moves forward. It involves the question of whether or not GA's electronic "election" system "as currently designed and implemented, suffers from major cybersecurity deficiencies that unconstitutionally burden Plaintiffs’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights and capacity to cast effective votes that are accurately counted."
That’s all.
Happy Thanks-giving.
Great discussion, everyone!
Ooops. Slight problem with undetected spell check issue. I meant to say ‘veracity’. 😃