Dear Friends,
Here’s the outline (these sections are all very short):
1
the new negop
2
the new negop leader
3
resolutions
4
subversive language
5
who is wearing the tinfoil hat?
6
what makes a write-in candidate viable?
7
splitting the vote1
the new negop
While We the People made huge strides yesterday (6/9) by taking control of the NEGOP away from Ricketts, we still have a long way to go.
We still have people in the Party, and in Party leadership, who think anyone who says “the 2020 election was stolen,” and “election machines can’t be trusted,” is wearing a tinfoil hat. One particular “leader” that I have in mind got booed yesterday when he made the bare assertion that we can trust the machines.
Trust has no place in the election equation. There’s too much at stake. We must have transparency and verifiability before we can call a process an election.
2
the new negop leader
Eric Underwood is our new leader, voted in by a transparent manual count of handwritten paper ballots. He’s a godly man.
The only complaint leveled against Mr. Underwood by Ricketts supporters was that he hasn’t been very successful in getting Republicans elected in his own County. (Eric was Chair of Lancaster County before his election to State Chair.) It’s a bogus complaint. The people voicing this complaint believe that trust is part of the election equation. They believe our elections are secure and fair. Our elections are not secure and fair. The fact is, most of the election cheating and rigging occurs in our urban areas (Sarpy, Douglas and Lancaster). It’s easier to cheat in populated areas.
3
resolutions
The day ended with voting on Resolutions submitted prior to the convention. We had no Resolution to vote on that called for a rejection of the 2020 election and demanded that our rightful President be recognized as such. The reason for this is that all Resolutions were sifted by the previous leadership before Mr. Underwood got elected.
4
subversive language
An “election” that is not honest is not an election.
An “election” that is not transparent is not an election.
An “election” that is not verifiable is not an election.
We have no evidence whatsoever that our elections are honest. We do not have any transparency or verifiability. Therefore they are not elections. Call them something else. They are not elections.
We the People do not currently own our elections (even though we are paying big money for them). They’ve been hijacked.
It is subversion of our language to call a process that has no transparency or verifiability an election.
Don’t buy into using the subversive language. It subtly veils the truth. It turns a lie into “truth.”
He who controls the language controls the masses.
5
who is wearing the tinfoil hat?
I’ve been invited to attend the World Premier of Selection Code.
It’s all about cheating with the machines.
You can watch the trailer here and here.
Why all the hoopla about election integrity?
Once again, because there is no “government of, by and for the People” without it.
Once again, because election cheating is literally destroying our Country before our very eyes.
The person claiming we can trust the machines is the one wearing the tinfoil hat.
6
what makes a write-in candidate viable?
Notwithstanding the above leadership change, the NEGOP is not united behind Pillen. Far from it.
What makes a write-in candidate viable at this time? Several things:
…the #neverpillen movement. I didn’t create this movement. It was created by others. Why? See here (Never Pillen 1) and here (Never Pillen 2)
…the fact that Pillen doesn’t understand the importance of the election integrity issue and the existential threat that election cheating represents to our security and survival. Attacks upon our election systems are State-of-Emergency attacks, and must be formally recognized as such.
…this is a big one…the desperation that will set in over the next few months as things continue to worsen under the illegitimate Biden regime. Combine that with the fact that Pillen wasn’t able to recognize that regime as illegitimate, and people will quickly lose what little faith they may have had in his ability. (He may at some later date recognize Biden as illegitimate, but the opportunity to have demonstrated real understanding of the situation, and the opportunity to have demonstrated the integrity to call it what it was, will have been lost.)
…the fact that Pillen hasn’t spoken out against scamdemic tyranny.
…the fact that Pillen doesn’t understand that the primary role of government is to secure our God-given rights.
…the fact that a write-in campaign must be hand-counted and we can build an audit into it.
There are many other reasons in the Never Pillen 1 and Never Pillen 2 links above.
7
splitting the vote
I have yet to address, in full, this fear-based approach to voting. Give me time.
Suffice it to say for now that the NEGOP is deathly afraid that I will do just that—split the NEGOP vote for governor. They are deathly afraid of Blood.
The Foundation for Applied Conservative Leadership (FACL) makes a great argument that voting for the lesser of two evils only prolongs the evil. Eight years of Bush gave us eight years of Obama (their policies were very similar). People went to sleep under Bush, because he had an R next to his name. Nevermind that he was a globalist and 9/11 happened under his watch. We would have been better off with four years of Gore. Republicans would have stayed engaged.
By the way, We have the full formal endorsement of the Nebraska Taxpayers for Freedom Executive Committee. Thank you, Mr. Kagan.
If you haven’t watched 2000 Mules yet, please do so: 2000 Mules.
May you prosper and be in health, even as your soul propers.
Your humble servant,
Robert J. Borer
I am not worried about the machines but am mortified at the blatant lack of transparency and the use of drop boxes. https://andrewlsullivan.substack.com/p/the-sham-of-automatic-mail-in-ballots
Pillen only got 34%. It would be a red tide if all who voted Herbster n you (n of course we want Rex's voters too) wrote you in. #keepthefaith