186 u.s. banks in trouble?

Dear Friends,

A little diversion today from the normal topic.

I listened to this interview yesterday with Wall Street analyst and former BlackRock portfolio manager Ed Dowd. It’s a sophisticated interview. Don’t be concerned if you don’t catch all the lingo (I certainly didn’t). You’ll understand enough. I highly recommend it. Dowd is the one who brought to light the publicly available actuarial data that showed a massive increase in all-cause mortality among healthy young working professionals at the exact same time the “covid” jabs were mandated.

A financial crisis may yet give us the near-death experience this nation (and the world) needs to wake everyone up and bring about change.

Tomorrow, we’ll return to addressing the attack that our SoS office is waging upon our shared political currency, that is, our vote.

See postscripts.

God bless,

Robert J. Borer

P.S. My friend Penny Stephens is on the war path with me. She has just stood up this website. Take a peek.

P.P.S. This is for Lincolnites. My friend and excellent writer John Roby shared the following with me this morning. Quoting:

I started a conversation with Suzanne Geist on Instagram based on a flyer I got in the mail.

So Suzanne: What’s the story with the flyer I got in the mail about you and other Republicans trying to weaken term limits in the Unicameral? I’d like to hear it from you because I’m all for term limits.

Her response:
I’m for term limits. But in a one house system, 8 years is too short. Government moves at a slow pace. It can easily wait out an ambitious Senator. It takes the first session to really learn how the system works. Once you become a subject matter expert, you’re term limited. An additional term or two would benefit the State and lessen the effect of the agencies and the lobby. The bill that would allow an additional term has been supported by Senators on both sides. It’s very needed.

My reply:
EIGHT YEARS is too short? You have to be kidding me on that one. EIGHT YEARS? So 12-16 years in the swamp is what it takes to be an effective legislator? Is that what you're telling me, Suzanne? If we have a problem with agencies and lobbies unduly affecting legislative decisions, how do you make that case that MORE exposure to agencies and lobbies will LESSEN that? I would really like to hear that answer. You can't be for terms limits and turn around in the very same breath and tell me you're for building a permanent ruling class.

The will of the PEOPLE you're supposed to be representing (including me) has been firmly stated: We don't want career politicians. They are the problem. The state government is corrupt. Please don't be part of the corruption.

Question #2: Where do you stand on Leirion's mask mandates and lockdowns? I'd like a clear answer to that one too, please. [Geist won’t answer this question. Because she’s a RINO and a rich elitist.]